Skip to the notes

History

From crag to gym: why NZ comps moved indoors

Published by the NZ Bouldering Notes editors

If you only know bouldering competitions from the last decade or so, it is easy to assume they have always happened on plywood under floodlights. They haven't. Competitive climbing in this country started on real rock, and the move indoors was gradual, practical and, looking back, almost inevitable. This note sets out why it happened, in neutral terms, without taking sides on whether anything was lost along the way.

Where it started: rock first

The Wikipedia overview of rock climbing in New Zealand records the first local rock climbing competition in 1987, held on the limestone crags at Duntroon in North Otago, and an outdoor event at Motuoapa near Lake Taupō in 1990 that drew climbers from around the North Island. Those were rope events on natural rock, run in the open air, and they set the template for a while: find a good crag, gather the community, climb.

Bouldering kept an outdoor competitive streak for longer than roped climbing did, partly because it needs so little gear. A crash pad and a field of boulders is enough for a jam or a points-based day out. We have written about one of the best-known examples in our note on the Bouldergaine at Kura Tāwhiti, and the wider picture is in our overview of NZ bouldering competitions from 2003 to 2016.

Weather and daylight

The most obvious pressure was the sky. An outdoor competition has to be booked weeks ahead, and New Zealand weather does not respect a booking. Rain makes limestone and greywacke slick, wind chills fingers, and a hot nor'west afternoon can turn good friction into greasy holds by lunchtime. Organisers running anything outdoors needed a fallback day, and climbers travelling from the other island needed to know the event would actually happen.

An indoor wall removes almost all of that. Conditions are much the same at the first problem as at the last, the lights stay on after dark, and a round can run in the middle of winter. For a national series with several rounds in different cities, that predictability matters more than anything else.

Access, land and rock wear

Outdoor bouldering areas sit on land that someone manages, whether that is the Department of Conservation, a farmer or a mix of both. A single competition can put a large number of people, pads and spectators on fragile ground in one day. It is well documented that heavy bouldering use can damage moss, lichen and ground vegetation, cause soil erosion around landings, and that impacts like these have led some land managers elsewhere to restrict bouldering altogether.

Repeated hard pulling also polishes holds. On soft rock, a popular problem can change character over years of ordinary traffic; a competition concentrates that traffic. Moving events indoors protects the outdoor areas that everyone wants to keep climbing on, and keeps relationships with landowners and managers on a calmer footing.

Setting control, fairness and spectators

Competition climbing depends on problems that nobody has tried before. Outdoors, that is hard to guarantee. Popular boulders have known sequences, local climbers may have worked them, and the stock of genuinely new lines in an accessible area is limited.

Indoors, setters can build problems from scratch, aim them at a particular level, and strip them the moment the round ends. They can repeat a style, change the angle, or set a slab for one category and a steep roof for another. That control is what makes the scoring formats in our explainer on how bouldering comps are scored workable: tops, zones and attempts only mean something if every competitor faces the same, previously unseen problem.

An outdoor boulder field spreads people out. Spectators wander between problems, parking is limited, and there is rarely a spot where everyone can watch a final together. An indoor wall gives a single viewing area, seating or mats for the crowd, and a natural focal point for finals. It also gives somewhere for families, juniors and first-timers to turn up without needing a car, a pad or a plan for getting off a hillside in the dark.

That shift has changed who comes along. A competition that starts at the local wall after work is a far lower barrier than a weekend trip to a remote boulder field, and that has helped widen the pool of people who try competing at all.

The growth of walls

None of this would have mattered without walls to compete on. The Wikipedia article on climbing walls traces the modern artificial wall back to a university corridor in England in 1964, and the first dedicated indoor climbing gym to Brussels in 1987. Here, the Rock climbing in New Zealand article describes the 1990s as the decade when indoor walls spread, and over the years since, commercial and club bouldering walls have opened in most of the main centres.

Once a few cities had walls big enough to hold a round, a touring indoor series became possible. Today the New Zealand Alpine Club supports a national indoor bouldering series that moves between cities each season, while Climbing New Zealand looks after national sport climbing competitions more broadly. For current rounds, categories and entry details, check the organisers' site: the official series site has the details.

What stayed outdoors

Moving the competitions inside did not end the outdoor scene. If anything, it gave the two a clearer division of labour. The wall is where people compete, train through winter and meet the wider community; the rock is where most of us go for the climbing itself. Informal outdoor jams and social days still happen, usually small and low-key, and they tend to work best when they are run with land managers' blessing and a light footprint.

The short version is that weather, fairness, protection of the rock and sheer convenience all pointed the same way. Competition bouldering in New Zealand followed the rest of the climbing world indoors, and the boulders at places like Kura Tāwhiti are arguably better off for it.